Features

Engineering assurance in one controlled system.

SeiaWorks connects requirements, V&V, execution, evidence, issues, RAM and Safety so teams can move from engineering intent to a defensible assurance record without rebuilding the trace in spreadsheets.

01

Requirements

Requirements, baselines and traceability

Control the engineering baseline, preserve exact versions and show how requirements decompose, allocate, refine and trace across the project.

Version historyCustom attributesSaved viewsBaselinesMaturity & volatilityTraceability graph
02

Verification & validation

A live RTM connected to the work

Plan how each requirement will be demonstrated and link the V&V record directly to controlled procedures, executions and accepted evidence.

Lifecycle stagesVerification methodsRTMProcedure captureEvidence statusVerification decisions
03

Execution

Controlled procedures and electronic test records

Turn approved procedures into structured field execution records with typed responses, limits, acceptance criteria, photos, attachments and retest history.

Procedure revisionsSections & stepsMeasurementsAutomatic validationRetestsExecution reports
04

Assurance participation

Witness, hold points and objective evidence

Coordinate project-defined assurance parties, notice periods and formal hold releases while keeping the resulting evidence attached to the exact work performed.

Witness pointsHold pointsNotice trackingAttendanceRelease recordsEvidence review
05

Issues & FRACAS

Move from finding to verified closure

Manage engineering issues in one lifecycle and specialise genuine failures into FRACAS without creating a second disconnected defect system.

Issue workflowAsset/location scopeFailure eventsRoot causeCorrective actionVerified closure
06

RAM assurance

Measure reliability against controlled criteria

Connect RAM requirements, operating exposure and chargeable FRACAS failures to transparent reliability and maintainability calculations and formal assessments.

MTBF / MDBF / MCBFFailure rateMTTRAvailabilityExposure historyFormal assessment
07

Safety assurance

A governed Hazard Log, not a spreadsheet

Manage hazards, causes, consequences, controls, risk assessments, evidence, independent review and formal acceptance in a controlled lifecycle.

Hazard LogRisk matricesSafety controlsResidual riskIndependent reviewFormal acceptance
08

Project context

Keep assurance attached to the physical project

Use Systems, Locations and Assets as shared project context so requirements, tests, issues, failures, RAM and Safety can be understood in the same structure.

SystemsLocationsAssetsAsset typesCross-domain scopeDrill-down

Requirements & traceability

Keep the baseline and its relationships visible.

Large registers need more than rows. SeiaWorks combines configurable requirement data, controlled versions, baselines and relationship traceability so teams can see both the requirement and its engineering context.

Representative product view

Granite Valley LRT

Requirements Register

All requirementsStatus: ActiveBaseline: B2System
GVL-SYS-00124

Traction power shall maintain nominal DC voltage...

System · TP · Version 3

Approved
GVL-SIG-00318

Train detection shall provide occupied state...

System · SIG · Version 3

Approved
GVL-COM-00191

PA announcements shall be intelligible...

System · COM · Version 3

Review
GVL-FLS-00042

Emergency egress lighting shall remain...

System · FLS · Version 3

Approved

32,400

Requirements

93%

Trace coverage

86%

Baseline mature

Verification & validation

Turn the RTM into a working assurance surface.

The RTM shows where each requirement is planned to be verified, what controlled procedure captures it, which execution produced the evidence and whether the evidence has been accepted.

Representative product view

Assurance · V&V

V&V Requirements Traceability Matrix

RequirementMethodCaptureEvidenceStatus
GVL-TP-00412InspectionSAT-TP-011Exec #2Accepted
GVL-SIG-00782TestSIT-SIG-006Exec #1Accepted
GVL-COM-00630DemonstrationSAT-COM-018PlannedPending
GVL-RS-00215TestDYN-RS-003Exec #3Review
Capture links open the exact controlled procedure revision. Evidence links open the exact execution report.

Electronic execution

Capture the test record at the point of work.

Approved procedure revisions become structured execution records. Measurements, observations, acceptance criteria, attachments and retests stay attached to the exact attempt rather than disappearing into a final PDF.

Representative product view

Electronic execution

SAT-TP-001 · Execution #2

Procedure Rev 4TPSS-013 Requirements
2.1

DC bus voltage

Acceptance · 730–770 V DC

Recorded · 748 V DC

PASS
2.2

Feeder breaker local operation

Acceptance · Operates correctly

Recorded · Pass

PASS
3.1

SCADA breaker command

Acceptance · Command + indication

Recorded · Pass

PASS

3/3

Steps passed

4

Attachments

2

Witnesses

Issues, FRACAS & RAM

Connect failures to engineering action and performance.

A failed test can become an Issue, a genuine equipment failure can be classified for FRACAS, and RAM can consume that controlled failure population alongside operating exposure.

Representative product view

Assurance · Reliability

RAM Assurance

2,840 h

Exposure

3

Chargeable failures

947 h

MTBF

99.4%

Availability

Criterion assessment

Availability ≥ 99.0%99.4%
MTBF ≥ 900 h947 h
MTTR ≤ 2.0 h1.8 h

Failure population

F-021 · Door control timeout
F-024 · Radio reboot
F-027 · HVAC protection trip

Safety assurance

Manage hazard acceptance as a governed lifecycle.

Hazards move through assessment, control implementation, verification, residual risk, independent review and formal acceptance with database-enforced gates and retained history.

Representative product view

Assurance · Safety

Hazard Log

48

Hazards

10

Accepted

6

Ready

HAZ-GVL-041

Unexpected OCS energisation

Residual risk · High

Accepted
HAZ-GVL-035

Train movement through unsecured turnout

Residual risk · Medium

Ready
HAZ-GVL-029

Loss of emergency communications

Residual risk · Medium

Verification
HAZ-GVL-018

Depot vehicle / pedestrian conflict

Residual risk · High

Implementation
Cause → Control → Requirement → Verification Evidence → Residual Risk → Review → Acceptance

Built for complex infrastructure

See how the pieces fit together for your project.